Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Michael Conlen wrote: Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, but I haven't been getting answers elsewhere. I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a single process space, something on the order of 1.5 GB so I can pass very large values for -Xms

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread Nikos Ntarmos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there. What is the value of vm.max_proc_mmap? Also, what is the value of KVA_PAGES in your kernel config? \n\n -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Nikos Ntarmos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> iD8DBQFDhNVCm6J1ac+VFgoRAhLJAJ

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread Michael Conlen
On Nov 23, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: --- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: Maybe the stack size matters in ur case somehow? I can see, that it is limited to 1GB, isn't it? I found something funny, too: limit cputime

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread W�rner
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: > > Maybe the stack size matters in ur case somehow? I can see, > that > > it is limited to 1GB, isn't it? > > > > I found something funny, too: > >> limit > > cputime unlimited > > filesize un

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread Michael Conlen
On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: --- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 23, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: --- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a I had a similar problem with shared m

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread W�rner
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: > > --- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large > >> mmap()'s in a > >> > > I had a similar problem with shared memory. > > > > I found an optio

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread ender
Arne Wörner wrote: --- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a I had a similar problem with shared memory. I found an option in /sys/conf/NOTES. I think it could help in your case, if u increase % options MAXDSIZ=(

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread Michael Conlen
On Nov 23, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Arne Wörner wrote: --- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a I had a similar problem with shared memory. I found an option in /sys/conf/NOTES. I think it could help in your case, if u increase

Re: mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread W�rner
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large > mmap()'s in a > I had a similar problem with shared memory. I found an option in /sys/conf/NOTES. I think it could help in your case, if u increase % options MAXDSIZ=(1024UL*1024*1024) % options

mmap()

2005-11-23 Thread Michael Conlen
Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, but I haven't been getting answers elsewhere. I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a single process space, something on the order of 1.5 GB so I can pass very large values for -Xms and -Xmx to java. I know I had been able