Arne Woerner wrote:
--- Slawek Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/13/06, Arne Woerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
40MB/s. CPU load negligible. I don't have
an exact number, as this machine has other
processes running. But overall, the system
load didn't exceed 5%.
Looks good...
I
--- Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arne Woerner wrote:
> > But why does switching from local disc
> > to NFS makes the PostgreSQL performance
> > so bad?
>
> A wild guess/try: does file locking work
> properly with NFS and the filer?
>
I would recommend the following test in order to answ
Arne Woerner wrote:
But why does switching from local disc to NFS makes the PostgreSQL
performance so bad?
A wild guess/try: does file locking work properly with NFS and the filer?
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
--- Slawek Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/13/06, Arne Woerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 40MB/s. CPU load negligible. I don't have
> an exact number, as this machine has other
> processes running. But overall, the system
> load didn't exceed 5%.
>
Looks good...
> I saturated fast ethernet
On 1/13/06, Arne Woerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hiho!
>
> --- Slawek Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A couple of days ago I've moved our
> > production database from local disks
> > to NetAPP filer serving NFS. Performance
> > for this server dropped by factor of 10
> > if not more.
> >
>
On 1/13/06, Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A couple of days ago I've moved our production database from local
> > disks to NetAPP filer serving NFS. Performance for this server dropped
> > by factor of 10 if not more. From a happy 10% load, the server hit the
> > ceiling and sees loa
