Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (a
Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (al
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rich Murphey wrote:
> > I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
> > effect on samba3 performance as well.
>
> No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
> transfers still average at 10MB/s (although it did peak at 2
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (although it did peak at 20MB/s once)
Which is really horrible for a em gigabit link wit
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
This isn't very methodical, but I see about
60% increase samba3 read bandwidth (from 14MB/s to
26Mb/s) when changing from the default
kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 to TSC, which
makes me wonder whether it mig
