Matt Hartzell wrote:
Would using the libpthread from 5 have any negative affect on MySQL
performance?
Not if MySQL is compiled on 6.x (libpthread was in libpthread.so.1 in
5.3+ but in libpthread.so.2 in 6.x).
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mai
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:27:50AM -0600, Matt Hartzell wrote..
> I have used the 6i n the same situation. RAID5 performance with 3 - 36
> GB SCSI disk is acceptable.
>
> I have never had a disk fail on these controllers so I can't comment on
> fail over.
>
> The util's on http://people.freebsd
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:27:50AM -0600, Matt Hartzell wrote..
I have used the 6i n the same situation. RAID5 performance with 3 - 36
GB SCSI disk is acceptable.
I have never had a disk fail on these controllers so I can't comment on
fail over.
The util's on http://p
I have used the 6i n the same situation. RAID5 performance with 3 - 36
GB SCSI disk is acceptable.
I have never had a disk fail on these controllers so I can't comment on
fail over.
The util's on http://people.freebsd.org/~jcagle/ don't seen to work
under 6.x, however status messages are sen
I have used the whole range (or somewhat) for internal SA's. Starting with
the internal one in DL380R1 and up to G4.
Performance of 6i in freebsd is better than 5i, but worse than if you
insert a external card (6402/6404). I mostly use the internal SA as
systemdisk only on systems with a lot of d
