if you want dual core + ht
you gotta buy intel extream cpu ( dual core + ht = 4cpu)
On 5/12/06, Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think intel chips with dual core don't have hyperthreading. The
operating system sees the second core like it would with
hyperthreading only.
On May 11, 200
On Friday 12 May 2006 01:58, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Scott Long wrote:
> >> So I guess the real question is: do we want to merge the UNIX domain
> >> socket locking work? The MySQL gains sound good, the performance drop
> >> under very high load seems problematic, and there are
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1, when i compile with
SMP...
You would need a Pentium Extreme (840, 955 or 965) for this. And
quite a bit of cash.
Achim
___
freebsd-performance@
930 is perfect, fast enough, no need to spend more money, thanks :)
- Original Message -
From: "Achim Patzner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ;
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: enabling hyper-threading on intel dual-core
i just bought an Intel
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Scott Long wrote:
So I guess the real question is: do we want to merge the UNIX domain socket
locking work? The MySQL gains sound good, the performance drop under very
high load seems problematic, and there are more general questions about
performance with other workload
On 12/5/2006 1:30, "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi!
>
> i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
> and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1, when i compile with SMP...
>
> sysctl says:
> machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 0
>
> is it right or i should see CPU 2 and 3 starting during
I think intel chips with dual core don't have hyperthreading. The
operating system sees the second core like it would with
hyperthreading only.
On May 11, 2006, at 12:00 PM, OxY wrote:
hi!
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006, David Xu wrote:
Fixing one of big lock contentions is not enough, you have to fix them
all, it is easy to see that a second contention becomes a top one. :-)
So I guess the real question is: do we want to merge the UNIX domain
socket locking work?
hi!
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1, when i compile with SMP...
sysctl says:
machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 0
is it right or i should see CPU 2 and 3 starting during the boot?
thanks for your help!
ps: i even compiled this option in ke
On Wed, 10 May 2006, David Xu wrote:
Fixing one of big lock contentions is not enough, you have to fix them all,
it is easy to see that a second contention becomes a top one. :-)
So I guess the real question is: do we want to merge the UNIX domain socket
locking work? The MySQL gains sound
10 matches
Mail list logo
