On 5/25/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nash Nipples wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> has anyone actually managed to speed up the thing up to 10-12 MB/s
>
> i have a good 7-9 MB/s on large files and that should be enough, but still,
out of curiosity?
>
>
No, not really. The performance of samb
> >
>
> I have the same issue here on several different systems. I have not been
> able to get throughput past ~70 megabits. Most times smbd hovers around
> 5-10% CPU usage on a Duron 1200 system. With this one system upgrading from
> a P2-350, to an Athlon 900 to the Duron 1200 have not changed p
Nash Nipples wrote:
Hi Guys,
has anyone actually managed to speed up the thing up to 10-12 MB/s
i have a good 7-9 MB/s on large files and that should be enough, but still, out of curiosity?
No, not really. The performance of samba on freebsd still sucks. I have
a gigabit link between m
On Thu, 25 May 2006 10:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> has anyone actually managed to speed up the thing up to 10-12 MB/s
>
> i have a good 7-9 MB/s on large files and that should be enough, but still,
> out of curiosity?
>
> Oh by the way:
> 100 MB et
At 01:42 PM 25/05/2006, Nash Nipples wrote:
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=1 who said u have to put it down?
When you are on the same subnet, is it not automatically disabled ?
---Mike
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
Hi Guys,
has anyone actually managed to speed up the thing up to 10-12 MB/s
i have a good 7-9 MB/s on large files and that should be enough, but still, out
of curiosity?
Oh by the way:
100 MB ethernet
ping -s 65507 -f windowshost ~ 10-12 MB/s
ftp open freebsdhost put/get 500MB.file ~ 10-12 M
etalk etalk wrote:
5.3 vs 6.0 The test tool is Iozone3_257, and the test command is
“./iozone -A -f /mnt/tmpfile.test -g 1g -n 1m -q 8k -y 2k -R -b
outfile-Af.xls ” (http://www.iozone.org/src/current/). We ran all the
tests on the same PC with 2.4 GHz Pentium CPU and 512M main memory.
Figure1~
