Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do I need to start a project? Matt Dillon is > already doing it. > > One thing that Matt has proved is that IQ isn't > cumulative. Because hes doing on his own what an > entire team of FreeBSD "engineers" can't

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread RoBeRT B
If you see/grep Danial Thom in FreeBSD related, consider this: http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/88q1/13785.8.html http://amasci.com/weird/flamer.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_war My personal fav' is the first link... How do we know that 'DT' even exists? Hmmm. DT - S, go awa

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Danial Thom
--- Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, > Michael Butler wrote: > > For everyone's benefit then, please feel free > to submit your patches > > along with your technical analysis. > > I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then > he can tell all

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Danial Thom
I'm not quote sure what you're trying to say, becuase clearly your not using a SATA controller, so you can't say the drives work in freebsd 4.x. And I only used Areca because its what I had lying around. I didn't try to make any specific analysis, or say that SATA was faster than scsi, only that th

Re: Help with improving mysql performance on 6.2PRE

2006-10-16 Thread Chris
On 15/10/06, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:49:04AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> On Oct 13, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Eric Hodel wrote: > Or did that change recently? It's only on certain systems, appare

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-16 Thread Chris
On 16/10/06, Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: >> For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches >> along with your technical analysis. > > I think his best bet is a fork, instead.

Re: Help with improving mysql performance on 6.2PRE

2006-10-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 07:05:28PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 15/10/06, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:49:04AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >>> On Oct 13, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Eric Hodel wrote: > >> Or did t