On 10/24/06, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:21:07PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> Has anyone come across some network software which uses kqueue
> "differently" to the above ?
lighttpd uses kqueue. Don't know how "different" it is.
Again its pretty sim
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:21:07PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> Has anyone come across some network software which uses kqueue
> "differently" to the above ?
lighttpd uses kqueue. Don't know how "different" it is.
m
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.o
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:49:47AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Mike Horwath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >I haven't dug into it yet, but dovecot is using kqueue() on FreeBSD.
> >
> >http://dovecot.org/
>
> Its a pretty simplistic use of kevent(); at least it is in 1.0r7 which
On 10/24/06, Mike Horwath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't dug into it yet, but dovecot is using kqueue() on FreeBSD.
http://dovecot.org/
Its a pretty simplistic use of kevent(); at least it is in 1.0r7 which
I have here. (Single submission of events to kevent() rather than
bunching them
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:21:07PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> All I've found thus far (and I hope I'm not to blame for my initial
> hackings of kqueue in a few bits of software!) are simple
> level-triggered uses which don't seem much better than Linux epoll or
> Solaris /dev/poll. Even libevent
