On Wednesday 25 October 2006 10:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
> with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the
> first results. The first tests are for serving up static data.
>
> System:
> Supermicro P
I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the
first results. The first tests are for serving up static data.
System:
Supermicro PDSMi Motherboard
1G Memory
Intel Pentium D CPU 3.40GHz
Intel Gigibit
On 10/24/06, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:03:34AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:21:07PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone come across some network softwar
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:03:34AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:21:07PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone come across some network software which uses kqueue
> >> "differently" to the above ?
> >
>
At 04:21 PM 10/20/2006, Mike Tancsa wrote:
The next set of comparisons I want to run is in our spam
scanners. The boxes which operate in round robin make heavy use of mysql, DNS
OK, we are just getting ready to run some tests for this
setup. SpamAssassin has some built in benchmarking that
