Re: Broadcom bge forwarding performance (was em forwarding performance )

2006-11-23 Thread Mike Tancsa
test setup description at http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html More testing :) This time with a pair of PCIe 1x bge nics, as well as using the patch at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-November/012389.html As I switched to bge, I could test against Dragonfly as well since

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-23 Thread Vlad Galu
On 11/23/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 12:43 PM 11/23/2006, Vlad Galu wrote: > Can you please completely remove the iptables support from your >Linux configuration, as well as removing support for any packet filter >in FreeBSD? Also, please enable fast_forwarding. I did that a

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-23 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:43 PM 11/23/2006, Vlad Galu wrote: Can you please completely remove the iptables support from your Linux configuration, as well as removing support for any packet filter in FreeBSD? Also, please enable fast_forwarding. I did that a while ago. See http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-23 Thread Vlad Galu
On 11/23/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 08:09 AM 11/22/2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >It would be interesting to know the real performance of Linux as a mere >router if we want a true comparision with FreeBSD performances. Re-tested, this time with a LINUX UP kernel and there is no

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-23 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 08:09 AM 11/22/2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: It would be interesting to know the real performance of Linux as a mere router if we want a true comparision with FreeBSD performances. Re-tested, this time with a LINUX UP kernel and there is not that much difference in overall speeds. I added a

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-23 Thread Marcelo Gardini do Amaral
> The FreeBSD pthread library and BIND don't work well together. If > you use the libthr library, performance goes up. I still didn't make tests with this lib, but I rebuilt everything on FreeBSD 6.0 and got nice numbers: DNS performance numbers on FreeBSD 6.0