At 02:12 PM 11/25/2006, Nick Pavlica wrote:
I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference.
Mike,
Have you done any testing on Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris? I
understand that it has a very robust IP stack. It would be
interesting to see how the three stack up against each other (FBSD,
LINUS,
I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference.
Mike,
Have you done any testing on Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris? I
understand that it has a very robust IP stack. It would be
interesting to see how the three stack up against each other (FBSD,
LINUS, SunOS).
--Nick
_
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:36:05AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Divacky Roman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> hm.. now I am confused. the rule is that having I586_CPU improves
> performance because optimized bzero/bcopy is included (its not
> included if you only have I686_CPU).
Haven't we been by thi
Divacky Roman wrote:
> hm.. now I am confused. the rule is that having I586_CPU improves
> performance because optimized bzero/bcopy is included (its not
> included if you only have I686_CPU).
>
> I dont understand why the generic version is used.
I believe the consensus was that I486 line disab
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:18:03PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 04:03 PM 11/24/2006, Divacky Roman wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >> At 03:28 AM 11/24/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:52 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
