Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-30 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:57 PM 11/30/2006, Ivan Voras wrote: Mike Tancsa wrote: > Yeah I inadvertently slighted the NetBSD folks by leaving them out. So > I guess I better give them a try as well. > > The part that really surprises me is the drop in performance as firewall > rules are added to RELENG_6 and above.

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-30 Thread Ivan Voras
Mike Tancsa wrote: > Yeah I inadvertently slighted the NetBSD folks by leaving them out. So > I guess I better give them a try as well. > > The part that really surprises me is the drop in performance as firewall > rules are added to RELENG_6 and above. Both LINUX and RELENG_4 seem to > scale w

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-30 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:51 AM 11/30/2006, Nick Pavlica wrote: Did a quick default install. Results are not so interesting since one stream livelocks the box. Basic stats at http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html If there are some OpenSolaris wizards out there who want me to tune, I am happy to retest... Mike, I'm n