Re: UDP performance.

2007-02-28 Thread Peter Losher
Mike Tancsa wrote: > Is that using PAE or AMD64 ? amd64 in both cases (Linux and FreeBSD) -Peter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow" signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: UDP performance.

2007-02-28 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 04:06 AM 2/28/2007, Peter Losher wrote: We recently put a stock Fedora Core 6 and a stock FreeBSD 6.2 on the same HW (HP ProLiant DL320 G5 Dual Core Xeons w/ 16GB RAM) and running Is that using PAE or AMD64 ? ---Mike ___ freebsd-perfor

Re: UDP performance.

2007-02-28 Thread Dave
On Feb 28, 2007, at 3:06 AM, Peter Losher wrote: Ivan Voras wrote: I agree in general, but MySQL performance is very exposed as an advocacy issue - it has traditionally been the source of statements like "FreeBSD's threading implementation is weak/bad/broken". And these days ISC can't cons

Re: UDP performance.

2007-02-28 Thread Dinesh Nair
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:06:33 -0800, Peter Losher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > > > I agree in general, but MySQL performance is very exposed as an > > advocacy issue - it has traditionally been the source of statements > > like "FreeBSD's threading implementation is weak/bad/br

Re: UDP performance.

2007-02-28 Thread Eric Anderson
On 02/28/07 03:06, Peter Losher wrote: Ivan Voras wrote: I agree in general, but MySQL performance is very exposed as an advocacy issue - it has traditionally been the source of statements like "FreeBSD's threading implementation is weak/bad/broken". And these days ISC can't consciously recom

UDP performance.

2007-02-28 Thread Peter Losher
Ivan Voras wrote: > I agree in general, but MySQL performance is very exposed as an advocacy > issue - it has traditionally been the source of statements like > "FreeBSD's threading implementation is weak/bad/broken". And these days ISC can't consciously recommend FreeBSD for use on high-traffic