Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:51:55PM -0400, Kevin Way wrote:
I built 7.0 as of 6 days ago, and ran the same test using 8-cores, ULE
and 4BSD. The results are available at:
http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0
Unfortunately
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:51:55 -0400
Kevin Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I built 7.0 as of 6 days ago, and ran the same test using 8-cores, ULE
> and 4BSD. The results are available at:
>
> http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0
>
> Unfortunately,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:51:55PM -0400, Kevin Way wrote:
> I built 7.0 as of 6 days ago, and ran the same test using 8-cores, ULE
> and 4BSD. The results are available at:
>
> http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0
>
> Unfortunately, I can't run t
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Kevin Way wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
If so, then your task is the following:
Make SYSV semaphores less dumb about process wakeups. Currently
whenever the semaphore state changes, all processes sleeping on the
semaphore are woken, even if we only
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Kevin Way wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
If so, then your task is the following:
Make SYSV semaphores less dumb about process wakeups. Currently whenever
the semaphore state changes, all processes sleeping on the semaphore are
woken, even if we only have released enough r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:37:27 +
"Sunil Sunder Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems to be an old posting. Were you able to solve this problem. What is
> your ifconfig output.
>
> Sunil Sunder Raj
> http://daemon.in
>
>
Hi Sunil,
We
