On Sun, November 4, 2007 22:27, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> I tried your patch. Ran a buildkernel, timed. Recompiled kernel
>> including
>> your patch, rebooted and reran. Please find results below.
>>
>> w/o patch
>> hulk# ti
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Josh Carroll wrote:
Josh, I included one too many changes in the diff and it made the results
ambiguous. I've scaled it back slightly by removing the changes to
sched_pickcpu() and included the patch in this email again. Can you run
through your tests once more? I'd like t
Hi Jeff,
I tried your patch. Ran a buildkernel, timed. Recompiled kernel including
your patch, rebooted and reran. Please find results below.
w/o patch
hulk# time make -j8 buildkernel
837.808u 138.167s 10:28.96 155.1% 6349+1349k 2873+7780io 303pf+0w
w patch
hulk# time make -j8 buildkernel
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I tried your patch. Ran a buildkernel, timed. Recompiled kernel including
your patch, rebooted and reran. Please find results below.
w/o patch
hulk# time make -j8 buildkernel
837.808u 138.167s 10:28.96 155.1% 6349+1349k 2
> Josh, I included one too many changes in the diff and it made the results
> ambiguous. I've scaled it back slightly by removing the changes to
> sched_pickcpu() and included the patch in this email again. Can you run
> through your tests once more? I'd like to commit this part soon as it
> hel
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Josh Carroll wrote:
Josh, thanks for your help so far. This has been very useful.
You're welcome, glad to help! Thanks for the effort and the patch.
Any testing you can run this through is appreciated. Anyone else lurking
in this thread who would like to is also welcome
