Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-05 Thread Josh Carroll
> Sysbench results: > # threadsslice=7 slice=13 slice_min=4 slice_min=2 > 42265.672250.36 2261.712297.08 > 82300.252310.02 2306.792313.61 > 12 2269.542304.04 2296.542279.73 >

Re: ULE vs 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: w/o patch hulk# time make -j8 buildkernel 837.808u 138.167s 10:28.96 155.1% 6349+1349k 2873+7780io 303pf+0w w patch hulk# time make -j8 buildkernel 838.554u 168.316s 10:52.10 154.4%

NFS: Linux Server, FreeBSD clients

2007-11-05 Thread Nico -telmich- Schottelius
Hello! I'm doing some tests on a Linux 2.6 kernel nfsd with freebsd clients. I want to use a cluster of 2 servers with heartbeat as failover and use the linux server as nfsd. Currently I am testing with iozone, which gives pretty bad performance results for standard connection (about 1/10 of wha

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-05 Thread Josh Carroll
> Turns out the last patch I posted had a small compile error because I > edited it by hand to remove one section. Here's an updated patch that > fixes that and changes the min/max slice values to something more > reasonable. Slice min should be around 4 with a max of 12. > > Also looks like 4BSD