Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-09 Thread Josh Carroll
> Josh, I had an interesting thought today. What if the reason 4BSD is > faster is because it distributes load more evenly across all packages > because it distributes randomly? ULE distributed across cores evenly but > not packages. Can you try the attached patch? This also turns the > defau

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-09 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Josh Carroll wrote: That's expected due to the fuzzy rounding of 128 / 10, etc. Can you set slice_min and slice both equal to 7 and see if the numbers come out better than without the patch but with a slice value of 7? Basically I'm trying to isolate the effects of the diff