Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-10 Thread Josh Carroll
> BTW, it doesn't make much sense to be measuring to millisecond precision > a quantity which has variation that is unknown but probably much larger > :) When trying to make comparisons to identify performance changes, a > careful statistical approach is necessary. > > Try the /usr/src/tools/tools

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
Josh Carroll wrote: ffmpeg: 1:38.885 sysbench: (4,8,12,16 threads respectively): 2221.93 2327.87 2292.49 2269.29 And buildworld: 13m47.052s I ran these after changing the slice value to 7 as well with this patch. ffmpeg: 1:38.547 BTW, it doesn't make much sense to be measurin

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-10 Thread Josh Carroll
> ffmpeg: 1:38.885 > > sysbench: (4,8,12,16 threads respectively): >2221.93 >2327.87 >2292.49 >2269.29 > > And buildworld: 13m47.052s I ran these after changing the slice value to 7 as well with this patch. ffmpeg: 1:38.547 sysbench: 2236.55 2321.02 2271.76 2254.85

Re: ULE vs 4BSD in RELENG_7

2007-11-10 Thread Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD
On Mon, November 5, 2007 00:50, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: > On Sun, November 4, 2007 22:27, Jeff Roberson wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Gelsema, P (Patrick) - FreeBSD wrote: >> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> >>> I tried your patch. Ran a buildkernel, timed. Recompiled kernel >>> including >>> your pa