Hugo Silva wrote:
Hugo Silva wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi all,
I found a painful performance problem with Apache + PHP 5 when
open_basedir directive is enabled.
Application performance drops by more than 50% with open_basedir
enabled.
There is also significant disproportion between usr /
Hugo Silva wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi all,
I found a painful performance problem with Apache + PHP 5 when
open_basedir directive is enabled.
Application performance drops by more than 50% with open_basedir
enabled.
There is also significant disproportion between usr / sys CPU load. (sy
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi all,
I found a painful performance problem with Apache + PHP 5 when
open_basedir directive is enabled.
Application performance drops by more than 50% with open_basedir enabled.
There is also significant disproportion between usr / sys CPU load. (sys
is much higher than
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As I reported a year ago - problem occured in 5.1.6 (maybe 5.1.5 - I
> never tried it, I jumped from 5.1.4 to 5.1.6 or newer). Can somebody
> look at PHP sources of those two versions and find the "bad change"?
Handily I have 5.1.4 sources right nex
Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I found a painful performance problem with Apache + PHP 5 when
open_basedir directive is enabled.
Looks like it's lstat()/readlink() overhead. I wrote a simple bit of
PHP similar to yours, but doing 10 * 1000 require "foo/%
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I found a painful performance problem with Apache + PHP 5 when
> open_basedir directive is enabled.
Looks like it's lstat()/readlink() overhead. I wrote a simple bit of
PHP similar to yours, but doing 10 * 1000 require "foo/%d/%d.php" calls
from th