> > What *exactly* do you mean by
> >
> >> machine still locks up with no activity for anywhere from 20 to 30 seconds.
> >
> > Is there disk activity? (e.g. activity light(s) flashing if you have them)
>
> Cant tell if there is disk activity its in a DC miles away ;)
>
> > Does top continue to
The plot thickens This stall is not just related to newfs you have to
have gstat running as well. If I do the newfs without gstat running then
no stall occurs. As soon as Im running gstat while doing the newfs then
everything locks as described.
Running truss on gstat shows the issue / cause
- Original Message -
From: "Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What *exactly* do you mean by
machine still locks up with no activity for anywhere from 20 to 30 seconds.
Is there disk activity? (e.g. activity light(s) flashing if you have them)
Cant tell if there is disk activity its in a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Steven Hartland" writes:
> From: "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220
> >> controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare.
> >
> > I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, wh
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220
controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare.
I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, while
keeping all other parameters exactly the
On 30/01/2008, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rewrite of the lockmgr primitive, for starters. Then we'll see what
> remains.
Ok, I know about the lockmgr efforts, and they will surely help some
loads. I'll try to compile the results I've been talking about in a
few days and post them
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Write performance is something that we are working on, expect to hear
about progress over the coming weeks/months.
Do you have some notes or descriptions about what is being worked on?
I'm currently doing some file system benchmarking for internal purpos
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:20:23PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Robert Watson wrote:
>> One thing I am looking at is how to best create a library of world
>> tarballs that can be used to populate a nfsroot (or hybrid of periodic
>> tarballs + binary diffs to save space
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
One thing I am looking at is how to best create a library of world
tarballs that can be used to populate a nfsroot (or hybrid of periodic
tarballs + binary diffs to save space). Then you could provide your
benchmark in a standardized format (start/en
Greetings,
After playing with many settings and testing various configuration, now
I'm able to to receive on bridge more then 800,000 packets/s
without errors, which is amazing!
Unfortunately the server behind bridge can't handle more then 250,000
packets/s
Please advise how I can increase th
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steven Hartland wrote:
The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220
controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare.
I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, while
keeping all oth
Steven Hartland wrote:
> The machine is running with ULE on 7.0 as mention using an Areca 1220
> controller over 8 disks in RAID 6 + Hotspare.
I'd suggest you first try to reproduce the stall without ULE, while
keeping all other parameters exactly the same.
__
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Write performance is something that we are working on, expect to hear
> about progress over the coming weeks/months.
Do you have some notes or descriptions about what is being worked on?
I'm currently doing some file system benchmarking for internal purposes
and I'm seeing
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I forgot to mention in my first post that I'm using ULE. The p800
controller has a (factory set) 25/75 read/write cache ratio.
There's maybe one additional thing: do you dual-boot Linux and FreeBSD?
If so, you'll need to set up a separate additional partition for the
databa
On 2008.01.30. 3:28, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:40:39 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Without threading I don't see this effect, the memory usage stops at a
sane limit and it's size can be affected by setting the max-cache-size
option.
I don't think y
15 matches
Mail list logo
