Re: network performance

Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: I'll use again hwpmc and LOCK_PROFILING to see what's going on. And will try the same benchmark on quad core processor as now numbers of cores/cpus matter :) Here are promised results - http://89.186.204.158/lock_

Re: network performance

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: I'll use again hwpmc and LOCK_PROFILING to see what's going on. And will try the same benchmark on quad core processor as now numbers of cores/cpus matter :) Here are promised results - http://89.186.204.158/lock_profiling-8.txt Finall

Re: network performance

Stefan Lambrev wrote: I'll use again hwpmc and LOCK_PROFILING to see what's going on. And will try the same benchmark on quad core processor as now numbers of cores/cpus matter :) Here are promised results - http://89.186.204.158/lock_profiling-8.txt Thanks. There is further work needed o

Re: network performance

Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Yes, it is gone with 8.0. Disable the module builds because some of them like this one probably need compile fixes. If you need a subset of modules use MODULES_OVERRIDE=list (in /etc/make.conf) Yes, kernel builds. I'm still playing wit

Re: network performance

Greetings, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Yes, it is gone with 8.0. Disable the module builds because some of them like this one probably need compile fixes. If you need a subset of modules use MODULES_OVERRIDE=list (in /etc/make.conf) Yes, kernel builds. I'm still

Re: network performance

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Yes, it is gone with 8.0. Disable the module builds because some of them like this one probably need compile fixes. If you need a subset of modules use MODULES_OVERRIDE=list (in /etc/make.conf) Yes, kernel builds. I'm still playing with it, but the first res

Re: network performance

Stefan Lambrev wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/p4-net.tbz is a sys/ tarball from my p4 branch, which includes these and other optimizations. I have some problems with compiling new kernel: cc -c -O2 -frename-re

Re: network performance

Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/p4-net.tbz is a sys/ tarball from my p4 branch, which includes these and other optimizations. I have some problems with compiling new kernel: cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-stri

Re: network performance

Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/p4-net.tbz is a sys/ tarball from my p4 branch, which includes these and other optimizations. I have some problems with compiling new kernel: cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=nocon

Re: network performance

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/p4-net.tbz is a sys/ tarball from my p4 branch, which includes these and other optimizations. I have some problems with compiling new kernel: cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=nocona -std=c99 -g -Wall -W

Re: network performance

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hello, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Thanks for investigating this. One thing to note is that ip flows from the same connection always go down the same interface, this is because Ethernet is not allowed to reorder frames.