Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:59:15 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, then please try this patch with '-n 1' (note: this patch doesn't > > contain the memory statistics hack via the HTTP interface, but I don't > > we don't need it for this test). [...] > (max-cache-size still 32M)

Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

Brett Bump wrote: Oops! ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkdq': ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: `do_check' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: er

Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

Oops! ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkdq': ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: `do_check' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: for each funct

Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server

Valerio Daelli wrote: Hi list we have a FreeBSD 7.0 NFS client (csup today, built world and kernel). It mounts a Solaris 10 NFS share. We have bad performance with 7.0 (3MB/s). We have tried both UDP and TCP mounts, both sync and async. This is our mount: nest.xx.xx:/data/export/hosts/bsd7.xx.x

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

On 02/13/08 21:44, wrote: Okay, then please try this patch with '-n 1' (note: this patch doesn't contain the memory statistics hack via the HTTP interface, but I don't we don't need it for this test). Sorry for the delay, here are the logs: Feb 19 13:51:29 cns00a named[45171]: database: inf