Re: performance degradation in 6.2 when adding a second quad core chip

2008-02-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
Noisex wrote: So Benjamin you want to tell, that adding additional CPU decrease the performance on 6.2? How did you made tests? I just want to know because in my plans to the next week is also add 2nd CPU (dual core) and some additional RAM to one of the my HP Proliant DL360 (generaly mysql db

Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server

2008-02-22 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 22, 2008, at 1:58 AM, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:42:45PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote: Chuck Swiger wrote: TCP mounts should be used whenever possible thesedays (I flipped the default mode in 8.0 the other day). And I made TCP mounts the default for Amd over a year ag

RE: performance degradation in 6.2 when adding a second quad core chip

2008-02-22 Thread Noisex
So Benjamin you want to tell, that adding additional CPU decrease the performance on 6.2? How did you made tests? I just want to know because in my plans to the next week is also add 2nd CPU (dual core) and some additional RAM to one of the my HP Proliant DL360 (generaly mysql db server) b

Re: performance degradation in 6.2 when adding a second quad core chip

2008-02-22 Thread benjamin thielsen
On Feb 21, 2008, at 17.49, Kris Kennaway wrote: benjamin thielsen wrote: hi folks- we've been experiencing some interesting behavior on single quad core computers as compared to dual quad core computers. Yes, this can happen when you run into concurrency bottlenecks in the application or

Re: Bad performance of 7.0 nfs client with Solaris nfs server

2008-02-22 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:42:45PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > TCP mounts should be used whenever possible thesedays (I flipped the > default mode in 8.0 the other day). And I made TCP mounts the default for Amd over a year ago. NFS really has moved on to TCP these days.