On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Chris wrote:
I got a server that is primarily handling large files not massive
files but files that are 15meg+ in size and very few smaller files.
So I decided to use the following options in newfs.
-f 4096 -b 32768
Eventually I realised this was a bad decision especially
On 25/02/2008, Bc. Radek Krejca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better,
> depending
> ZB> on hardware choices
> ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel
> Ether
> ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports
Hi.
I got a server that is primarily handling large files not massive
files but files that are 15meg+ in size and very few smaller files.
So I decided to use the following options in newfs.
-f 4096 -b 32768
Eventually I realised this was a bad decision especially when I
noticed vfs.bufdefragcnt
Hi,
ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better, depending
ZB> on hardware choices
ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel Ether
ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports are my personal favorite
ZB> - enable polling (this will make a _huge_ differen