(Sorry for top posting.)
Its not actually -that- bad an idea to compare different applications.
It sets the "bar" for how far the entire system {hardware, OS,
application, network} can be pushed.
If nsd beats bind9 by say 5 or 10% over all, then its nothing to write
home about. If nsd beats bind9
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Olive
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> See this:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-February/003383.html
>>
> I do not see the patch in this thread :)
> Is there a patch for 7.0-RELEASE? (If not already patched?)
The patch is posted now.
signature.
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2008-February/003383.html
>>
> I do not see the patch in this thread :)
> Is there a patch for 7.0-RELEASE? (If not already patched?)
Try asking the author of the patch.
signature.a
Greetings.
Ivan Voras wrote:
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greeting,
Philip Murray wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new iSCSI initiator (thanks!) with 7, but I'm
getting dismal performance. A simple dd will will max out at about
2MB/sec, and untarring the likes of the ports tree is a painful
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Oliver Herold; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7
Olive
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> Philip Murray wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to use the new iSCSI initiator (thanks!) with 7, but I'm
>> getting dismal performance. A simple dd will will max out at about
>> 2MB/sec, and untarring the likes of the ports tree is a painful task.
> I have simila
Greeting,
Philip Murray wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new iSCSI initiator (thanks!) with 7, but I'm
getting dismal performance. A simple dd will will max out at about
2MB/sec, and untarring the likes of the ports tree is a painful task.
I have similar experience. In my case I was using for
Hi,
I'm trying to use the new iSCSI initiator (thanks!) with 7, but I'm
getting dismal performance. A simple dd will will max out at about 2MB/
sec, and untarring the likes of the ports tree is a painful task.
The target is another FreeBSD 7 machine running the NetBSD target
daemon from po
22.02.08 @ 12:18 Niki Denev wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Vadim Goncharov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
After looking at humorous quoting about a man trying to ban unused
addresses in
his network by putting 65535 ifcong_XXX_aliasYYY lines to rc.conf, I
decided to
check this per
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:22:46PM +0200 Arkadi Shishlov mentioned:
> Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>> I'd suggest you to disable open_basedir at all or roll out specialized
>> implementation. I had a lot of similar problems with open_basedir in
>> the past, so I just rewrote it to match our specific secu
11 matches
Mail list logo