At Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:22:38 +0200,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry again for the long delay, I've got other work to do, and our 9.4
> servers work fine (at least on FreeBSD 6, though, see the other
> -performance- problem)...
No problem, I understand testing a beta version canno
Sorry again for the long delay, I've got other work to do, and our 9.4
servers work fine (at least on FreeBSD 6, though, see the other
-performance- problem)...
On 02/20/08 04:30, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:59:15 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay,
On 2008.04.03. 15:21, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/29/08 11:40, Attila Nagy wrote:
ps: I have an other problem. I've recently switched from a last year
6-STABLE to 7-STABLE and got pretty bad results on the same machine
with the same bind (9.4).
The graphs are he
Greetings,
Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/29/08 11:40, Attila Nagy wrote:
ps: I have an other problem. I've recently switched from a last year
6-STABLE to 7-STABLE and got pretty bad results on the same machine
with the same bind (9.4).
The graphs are here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/nagy.attila/2
00.00% selrecord [22]
1.0 121450.00 2006.000 100.00% copyin [23]
1.0 123397.00 1947.000 100.00% cpu_switch [24]
Here are the full output:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/bind94-performance-fbsd6vs7-20080403/
At first glimpse it seems that there is
