2009/9/30 Dieter :
>> > My question is why is FreeBSD's disk i/o performance so bad?
>>
>> As I mentioned... this was discussed actively in slashdot. You will find
>> there many good comments on this.
>
> All I saw in slashdot was a ffs vs ext comment. I don't believe the problems
> I'm seeing ar
but if we measure the performance based on feelings we could advertise
freebsd:
"feels better"
do not forget the marketing value :))
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:21 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Well, since FreeBSD 8.0 started, I realized on several
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:21 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Well, since FreeBSD 8.0 started, I realized on several boxes (doens't
matter whether SMP or UP, 2 GB or 8 GB or 16 GB) massive performance
issues when compiling, even on a 8-core box. This is not 'measured' in
hard numbers, it is the 'feeling' s
makes no sense to stay with freebsd for zfs:
http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
I think this will not change soon. ZFS is, at this moment, the only
> thing that keeps me with FreeBSD. In every other case, serving, number
> crunching (oh, we need a lot of I/O performance in those number
> crun
> > My question is why is FreeBSD's disk i/o performance so bad?
>
> As I mentioned... this was discussed actively in slashdot. You will find
> there many good comments on this.
All I saw in slashdot was a ffs vs ext comment. I don't believe the problems
I'm seeing are filesystem related.
> >
Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/9/29 Randy Schultz :
>> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>>
>> |
>> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
>> | think
>> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
>> | read the
>> | documentation, and didn't se
2009/9/30 O. Hartmann :
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2009/9/29 Randy Schultz :
>>> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>>>
>>> |
>>> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
>>> | think
>>> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
>>> | read the
Andrew Kuriger wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:26:34 PDT, Dieter
> wrote:
>> In message ,
>> Francisco Reyes writes:
>>> Steven Hartland writes:
>>>
Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
Comments?
2009/9/29 István :
> withdtrac...@#!#@! :)
>
> I think that the most interesting opionion these benchmarks tell is
>> that we are slow on random, threaded I/O operations. I think we need
>> to investigate more in this direction.
First thing, it would be interesting if someone could be rep
withdtrac...@#!#@! :)
I think that the most interesting opionion these benchmarks tell is
> that we are slow on random, threaded I/O operations. I think we need
> to investigate more in this direction.
>
> Attilio
>
>
> --
> Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
>
2009/9/29 Randy Schultz :
>
> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>
> |
> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
> | think
> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
> | read the
> | documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Randy Schultz wrote:
>
> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>
> |
> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
> | think
> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
> | read the
> | documentation, and didn't
- "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
|
| Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
| think
| this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
| read the
| documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which
| is
| available in ports,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:26:34 PDT, Dieter
wrote:
> In message ,
> Francisco Reyes writes:
>> Steven Hartland writes:
>>
>> > Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
>> >
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
>> > Comments?
>>
>> This was discussed in
György Vilmos writes:
I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major
releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from
version to version.
Thanks!
Very interesting.
Did you share it with the Postgresql list yet?
I think they would find it very int
2009/9/29 György Vilmos :
> Hi,
>
> I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major
> releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from
> version to version.
> You can find the article here:
> http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/09/26/postgresql_history
>
> The
Hi,
I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major
releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from
version to version.
You can find the article here:
http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/09/26/postgresql_history
The tests were conducted on FreeBSD 8/amd64 on
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:29 AM, István wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-current&m=125413848303229&w=2
>
>
well I didn't knew that fresh one. Nice to know. Gona test for RC too.
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Francisco Reyes >wrote:
>
> > Steven Hartland writes:
> >
> > Just noticed
18 matches
Mail list logo
