> >> > My question is why is FreeBSD's disk i/o performance so bad?
> > Here is a specific demo of one disk i/o problem I'm seeing. Should be
> > easy to reproduce?
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/2008-July/003533.html
> >
> > This was over a year ago, so add 7.1 to
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> What mode do you have set for your controllers in BIOS?
>>> AHCI or IDE/Legacy/etc?
>> Yeah I read about this too but my BIOS offers only "RAID" and "SATA" -
>> tried both so I think
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> > What mode do you have set for your controllers in BIOS?
> > AHCI or IDE/Legacy/etc?
>
> Yeah I read about this too but my BIOS offers only "RAID" and "SATA" -
> tried both so I think AHCI is just not suppo
2009/9/29 Francisco Reyes
> György Vilmos writes:
>
> I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major
>> releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from
>> version to version.
>>
>
> Thanks!
> Very interesting.
> Did you share it with the Postgresq
Hi,
2009/9/29 Attilio Rao
> 2009/9/29 György Vilmos :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've done a benchmark of recent versions of PostgreSQL's last five major
> > releases to see how performance has changed during the past years from
> > version to version.
> > You can find the article here:
> > http://suckit.b
Martin MATO wrote:
>István a écrit :
>
> have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
>
> you might have overlooked it.
>
> yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael [1] wrote:
>
>
>
> Since the article says that
on 30/09/2009 19:47 Oliver Lehmann said the following:
> Robert Noland wrote:
>
>> I would also be curious how that ahci driver from -CURRENT is performing
>> relative to other implementations.
>
> I tried 8.0-RC1-i386.iso but the ahci driver didn't picked up my promise
> nor my VIA controller. S
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> What mode do you have set for your controllers in BIOS?
> AHCI or IDE/Legacy/etc?
Yeah I read about this too but my BIOS offers only "RAID" and "SATA" -
tried both so I think AHCI is just not supported on my K8T800Pro chipset
for the SATA controller.
--
Oliver Lehmann
h
Robert Noland wrote:
> I would also be curious how that ahci driver from -CURRENT is performing
> relative to other implementations.
I tried 8.0-RC1-i386.iso but the ahci driver didn't picked up my promise
nor my VIA controller. So all the numbers now for the "old" ata driver.
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:56:51 -0500
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Daniel O'Connor writes:
> >
> > > In the end I got a PCI Silicon Image 3114 based controller and it
> > > worked fine.
> >
> > I thought about getting a controller with a SiL-
István a écrit :
have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
you might have overlooked it.
yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael [1] wrote:
Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
At 09:10 AM 9/30/2009, Bruce Cran wrote:
I ran the tiobench test on -CURRENT a few days ago and the ahci driver
showed an improvement in latency over the ata driver; I didn't
test transfer rates though.
I was running the AHCI driver on the freebsd-current tinderbox for 3
weeks with very good
have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
you might have overlooked it.
yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael wrote:
> > Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
> > this has a bit to
> Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
> this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read the
> documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is
> available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark.
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:17 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Robert Noland writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> >> I got a Promise SATA300 TX2plus instead. I'll rune some tests with later
> >> (when I'm back home ;))
> >
> > I would also be curious how that ahc
Robert Noland writes:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
I got a Promise SATA300 TX2plus instead. I'll rune some tests with later
(when I'm back home ;))
I would also be curious how that ahci driver from -CURRENT is performing
relative to other implementations.
So ther
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor writes:
>
> > In the end I got a PCI Silicon Image 3114 based controller and it worked
> > fine.
>
> I thought about getting a controller with a SiL-Chil too because they are
> kinda cheap and another system I intend to
Daniel O'Connor writes:
In the end I got a PCI Silicon Image 3114 based controller and it worked
fine.
I thought about getting a controller with a SiL-Chil too because they are
kinda cheap and another system I intend to use with SATA harddisks has no
SATA on-board. But then I searched throug
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> A colleague of mine has the same disks in a new Nvidia Atom 330
> system and he told me that he reaches around 70MB/sec write speed
> with a single large file on a single disk running linux 2.6.
>
> I hooked the disk up to my client:
>
> FreeBSD 7.2-STAB
Hi,
I got 4 new SATA disks (WD Green, 1TB, WD10EADS) I want to use to replace
my old 250GB disks attached to my 3ware controller.
I want to reuse the old 250GB disks in some systems running old PATA disks
ight now as system drives. So what I did now was gathering SATA performance
tatistics with th
20 matches
Mail list logo
