Jack Vogel wrote:
Intel can only support a finite set of hardware, it is NOT a matter of
it being some "Intel" part, its
a matter of some SFPs that are out there DO NOT WORK, so engineering
here was able to
delimit, validate, and thus certify a specific set of SFPs, the
software check is there
Intel can only support a finite set of hardware, it is NOT a matter of it
being some "Intel" part, its
a matter of some SFPs that are out there DO NOT WORK, so engineering here
was able to
delimit, validate, and thus certify a specific set of SFPs, the software
check is there to make
sure that you
Hello,
I am building a packet capture box based on the Intel 82599 controller
in a FreeBSD box. I purchased the Intel Ethernet X520 cards and Finisar
SFP+'s, but apparently the 82599 does not support non-Intel SFP+'s? The
code in the driver checks for the SFP vendor if a bit in the device
c
Murat Balaban [mu...@enderunix.org] wrote:
>
> Much of the FreeBSD networking stack has been made parallel in order to
> cope with high packet rates at 10 Gig/sec operation.
>
> I've seen good numbers (near 10 Gig) in my tests involving TCP/UDP
> send/receive. (latest Intel driver).
>
> As far
--- On Sun, 5/9/10, Jack Vogel wrote:
> From: Jack Vogel
> Subject: Re: Intel 10Gb
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: "Murat Balaban" , freebsd-...@freebsd.org,
> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, "grarpamp" , "Vincent
> Hoffman"
> Date: Sunday, May 9, 2010, 1:12 PM
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:43
