Re: Possible evidence of performance regression for 8.1-S (vs. 7.1)

2010-10-21 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 22 October 2010 06:42, David Wolfskill wrote: >> Julian's suggestion of booting the 8.1 kernel on the 7.1 OS will definitely >> narrow down the list of suspects. > > I'll see about doing something along those lines, but I doubt it will be > all that helpful, actually. It narrows down the susp

Re: Possible evidence of performance regression for 8.1-S (vs. 7.1)

2010-10-21 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:53:30PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > ... > An observation: on 8.1, both user and sys times are less, but real time is > higher. So 8.1 finished the build using less CPU, but spent more time > waiting for something else. Interesting; thanks for pointing that out. > Disk?

Re: Possible evidence of performance regression for 8.1-S (vs. 7.1)

2010-10-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 20), David Wolfskill said: > Almost 2 years ago, we migrated from a lightly-patched 6.2-R to 7.1-R with > 5 commits that were made to 7.1-S backported to it. On the same hardware > (not the HP mentioned above), I measured a 35% reduction in elapsed time > for one particula