On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:03:34PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> ...
> Since you now have the two kernels readily available, can you rule out
> NFS by just repeating the step which involves it in both kernels and
> compare the results?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:47:11PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> ...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:34:08AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 07:29 AM 10/26/2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
>
> >OK -- but we were using the default scheduler in each case. The basic
> >point I'm making here is the apparent performance regression for
> >similarly-configured systems under 7.1 vs
At 07:29 AM 10/26/2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
OK -- but we were using the default scheduler in each case. The basic
point I'm making here is the apparent performance regression for
similarly-configured systems under 7.1 vs. 8.1.
ULE is the default in 7 as well. Perhaps remove some of the k
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:09:53PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> ...
> >It appears to me that the last test runs show results that are just
> >about identical to the "native" 8.1-S kernel+userland, so if I
> >understand the logic correctly, that appears to implicate something in
> >the 8.1-S kern
