2011/3/12 Poul-Henning Kamp :
> In message <4d7b44af.7040...@freebsd.org>, Martin Matuska writes:
>
>
> Thanks a lot for doing this properly.
>
>>What significance level should I take?
>
> I think I set ministat(1) to use 95 % confidence level by default
> and that is in general a pretty safe bet (
In message <4d7b44af.7040...@freebsd.org>, Martin Matuska writes:
Thanks a lot for doing this properly.
>What significance level should I take?
I think I set ministat(1) to use 95 % confidence level by default
and that is in general a pretty safe bet (1 in 20 chance)
>I hope this approach is b
2011/3/12 Martin Matuska
> Hi Poul-Henning,
>
> I have redone the test for majority of the processors, this time taking
> 5 samples of each whole testrun, calculating the average, standard
> deviation, relative standard deviation, standard error and relative
> standard error.
>
> The relative sta
2011/3/12 Martin Matuska
> Hi Poul-Henning,
>
> I have redone the test for majority of the processors, this time taking
> 5 samples of each whole testrun, calculating the average, standard
> deviation, relative standard deviation, standard error and relative
> standard error.
>
> The relative sta
Hi Poul-Henning,
I have redone the test for majority of the processors, this time taking
5 samples of each whole testrun, calculating the average, standard
deviation, relative standard deviation, standard error and relative
standard error.
The relative standard error is below 0.25% for ~91%, betw
