On 9 March 2012 09:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Well, having to pick up existing ideas and incarntions of those for
> Linux is always a pain in the ass, but necessary at the moment. The
> "experts" neglected long time the need for keeping FBSD on par with KMS
> stuff or all the other development done
On 03/09/12 14:35, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 12:36 09/03/2012, you wrote:
>> Sorry if you feel boring by those messages, but soem of us still get wet
>> eyes when it comes to OpenCL and LLVm (LLVM is supposed to become soon
>> the backend compiler in FreeBSD, as I understand). On PHORONIX I read
>
At 12:36 09/03/2012, you wrote:
Sorry if you feel boring by those messages, but soem of us still get wet
eyes when it comes to OpenCL and LLVm (LLVM is supposed to become soon
the backend compiler in FreeBSD, as I understand). On PHORONIX I read
this message days ago:
http://www.phoronix.com/sca
Sorry if you feel boring by those messages, but soem of us still get wet
eyes when it comes to OpenCL and LLVm (LLVM is supposed to become soon
the backend compiler in FreeBSD, as I understand). On PHORONIX I read
this message days ago:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA2NzM
I
