Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)

2012-04-15 Thread Richard Kojedzinszky
Thanks for the replies. I dont think so that perl counts anything in the test, just run the code with truss -D, you will see the timing that the open() syscall takes just more time with multilabel enabled. Even a single touch shows that: # truss -D touch 1 0.56431 mmap(0x0,32768,PROT_RE

Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)

2012-04-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Apr 15, 2012, at 12:30 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am 04/15/12 15:59, schrieb Richard Kojedzinszky: >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> Unfortunately, dont know why, but on my xen virtualised environment, >> fbsd amd64 domU performs much slower, not only 30 times. Without >> multilabel, file creati

Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)

2012-04-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Apr 15, 2012, at 1:17 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am 04/15/12 22:00, schrieb Garrett Cooper: >> On Apr 15, 2012, at 12:30 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> Am 04/15/12 15:59, schrieb Richard Kojedzinszky: Thank you for the reply. Unfortunately, dont know why, but on my xen virtualised

Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)

2012-04-15 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 04/15/12 22:00, schrieb Garrett Cooper: > On Apr 15, 2012, at 12:30 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Am 04/15/12 15:59, schrieb Richard Kojedzinszky: >>> Thank you for the reply. >>> >>> Unfortunately, dont know why, but on my xen virtualised environment, >>> fbsd amd64 domU performs much slower, no

Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)

2012-04-15 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 04/15/12 15:59, schrieb Richard Kojedzinszky: > Thank you for the reply. > > Unfortunately, dont know why, but on my xen virtualised environment, > fbsd amd64 domU performs much slower, not only 30 times. Without > multilabel, file creation speed is around 2500/s, but with multilabels > enabled