Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)

2012-08-16 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 8/17/12 7:15 AM, Marie Bacuno II wrote: On Aug 16, 2012, at 18:47, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II wrote: Hello fellow listers, On a server with 512GB RAM it appears that vm.kmem_size_ma

Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)

2012-08-16 Thread Marie Bacuno II
On Aug 16, 2012, at 18:47, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II >> wrote: >>> Hello fellow listers, >>> >>> On a server with 512GB RAM it appears that vm.kmem_size_max is not >>> being auto-tun

Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)

2012-08-16 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II > wrote: >> Hello fellow listers, >> >> On a server with 512GB RAM it appears that vm.kmem_size_max is not >> being auto-tuned to use >329853485875 (~307GB). >> >> On this machine vm.km

Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)

2012-08-16 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Gezeala M. Bacuño II wrote: > Hello fellow listers, > > On a server with 512GB RAM it appears that vm.kmem_size_max is not > being auto-tuned to use >329853485875 (~307GB). > > On this machine vm.kmem_size is equal to vm.kmem_size_max > > # from sysctl > vm.kmem_si

vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)

2012-08-16 Thread Gezeala M . Bacuño II
Hello fellow listers, On a server with 512GB RAM it appears that vm.kmem_size_max is not being auto-tuned to use >329853485875 (~307GB). On this machine vm.kmem_size is equal to vm.kmem_size_max # from sysctl vm.kmem_size_max: 329853485875 vm.kmem_size: 329853485875 On a machine with 1GB of RAM