On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config,
> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they
> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
Hey cool! And F
I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about
config, but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is
interesting. And they are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html
Graphs are avai
