End of test sessions [Was Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 9]

Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:52:16 -0700 

Il 26.03.2013 13:00 freebsd-performance-requ...@freebsd.org ha scritto:

Send freebsd-performance mailing list submissions to
        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        freebsd-performance-requ...@freebsd.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        freebsd-performance-ow...@freebsd.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of freebsd-performance digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
      Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8] (Davide D'Amico)
   2. Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
      Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8] (Davide D'Amico)
   3. Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
      Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8] (Adrian Chadd)
   4. Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
      Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8] (Davide D'Amico)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:00:14 +0100
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.dam...@contactlab.com>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
        Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Message-ID: <5150586e.5040...@contactlab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Thank you Daniel for your tests, here my tests using sysbench v0.5 MySQL 
Benchmarks r/w (80%/20%) test on 10.000.000 rows 2.000.000 query using
Standard OLTP: values represent the number of transactions per second
and the first number is obtained using 1 thread, the second one using 2 
threads, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48 and 64 threads.

CentOS 6 5.6.10-ent:
4163 7653 10905 12511 13556 14832 16270 16733 16925 16895

VM CentOS 6 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1:
3201 5543 8299 12823 14331 15658 16842 15946 11529 9457

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1 (*):
2102 3572 5917 8060 7905 7734 7104 7304 7612 7058

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1 (**):
2026 3290 4927 ... (I stopped the tests because it seems similar to the 
previous one)

FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent ZFS+SSD:
2780 4371 6876 8202 8077 7780 7563 7632 7960 8062

FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent ZFS tweaked+SSD:
2589 4679 6438 7073 7121 7227 7132 7273 7623 7672

Well, CentOS outperforms FreeBSD in every thread concurrency, and not
only in standard oltp tests.
I think I'll use CentOS for mysql servers.

Thank you for all your time spent, support and tests.

d.


(*)
Using:
   - sysctl.conf:
     - kern.eventtimer.periodic=1;
     - kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast;
   - loader.conf:
     - kern.hz=100;

(**)
Using:
   - sysctl.conf:
     - kern.eventtimer.periodic=1;
     - kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast;
   - loader.conf:
     - kern.hz=100;
   - malloc.conf -> 3N


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:45:58 +0100
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.dam...@contactlab.com>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
        Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Message-ID: <51506326.9020...@contactlab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Il 25/03/13 15:00, Davide D'Amico ha scritto:
Thank you Daniel for your tests, here my tests using sysbench v0.5 MySQL Benchmarks r/w (80%/20%) test on 10.000.000 rows 2.000.000 query using 
Standard OLTP: values represent the number of transactions per second
and the first number is obtained using 1 thread, the second one using 2 
threads, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48 and 64 threads.

CentOS 6 5.6.10-ent:
4163 7653 10905 12511 13556 14832 16270 16733 16925 16895

VM CentOS 6 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1:
3201 5543 8299 12823 14331 15658 16842 15946 11529 9457

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1 (*):
2102 3572 5917 8060 7905 7734 7104 7304 7612 7058

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1 (**):
2026 3290 4927 ... (I stopped the tests because it seems similar to the 
previous one)

FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent ZFS+SSD:
2780 4371 6876 8202 8077 7780 7563 7632 7960 8062

FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent ZFS tweaked+SSD:
2589 4679 6438 7073 7121 7227 7132 7273 7623 7672

Well, CentOS outperforms FreeBSD in every thread concurrency, and not
only in standard oltp tests.
I think I'll use CentOS for mysql servers.

Thank you for all your time spent, support and tests.

d.


(*)
Using:
   - sysctl.conf:
     - kern.eventtimer.periodic=1;
     - kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast;
   - loader.conf:
     - kern.hz=100;

(**)
Using:
   - sysctl.conf:
     - kern.eventtimer.periodic=1;
     - kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast;
   - loader.conf:
     - kern.hz=100;
   - malloc.conf -> 3N


Well, because of a misunderstanding the previous tests were related to
oltp.lua dataset/workload, using the oltp_simple I have:

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1:
2919 4758 8661 14075 16436 16328 17172 17636 17926 18218

CentOS 6:
5677 11253 22129 32096 45800 47091 42608 13097 12979 13282

FreeBSD 9.1:
2874 5179 9154 13199 14291 11627 19766 19887 21197 21787

I don't know is these tests could help finding where the problem is, I
hope so.

I can do other test until wednesday 27/03 if you need.

Thanks,
d.



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:11:16 -0700
From: Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>
To: "Davide D'Amico" <davide.dam...@contactlab.com>
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
        Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Message-ID:
        <CAJ-Vmo=ne+ck17dwy18aullwta690owsk4_iroudacfvrhv...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Can you please run a Linux install in a FreeBSD jail so we can see
whether it's the kernel or userland?

Thanks,




Adrian
On 25 March 2013 07:45, Davide D'Amico <davide.dam...@contactlab.com> wrote: 
Il 25/03/13 15:00, Davide D'Amico ha scritto:
Thank you Daniel for your tests, here my tests using sysbench v0.5 MySQL Benchmarks r/w (80%/20%) test on 10.000.000 rows 2.000.000 query using Standard OLTP: values represent the number of transactions per second and the first number is obtained using 1 thread, the second one using 2 
threads, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48 and 64 threads.

CentOS 6 5.6.10-ent:
4163 7653 10905 12511 13556 14832 16270 16733 16925 16895

VM CentOS 6 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1:
3201 5543 8299 12823 14331 15658 16842 15946 11529 9457

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1 (*):
2102 3572 5917 8060 7905 7734 7104 7304 7612 7058

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1 (**):
2026 3290 4927 ... (I stopped the tests because it seems similar to the 
previous one)

FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent ZFS+SSD:
2780 4371 6876 8202 8077 7780 7563 7632 7960 8062

FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent ZFS tweaked+SSD:
2589 4679 6438 7073 7121 7227 7132 7273 7623 7672
Well, CentOS outperforms FreeBSD in every thread concurrency, and not 
only in standard oltp tests.
I think I'll use CentOS for mysql servers.

Thank you for all your time spent, support and tests.

d.


(*)
Using:
   - sysctl.conf:
     - kern.eventtimer.periodic=1;
     - kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast;
   - loader.conf:
     - kern.hz=100;

(**)
Using:
   - sysctl.conf:
     - kern.eventtimer.periodic=1;
     - kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast;
   - loader.conf:
     - kern.hz=100;
   - malloc.conf -> 3N
Well, because of a misunderstanding the previous tests were related to 
oltp.lua dataset/workload, using the oltp_simple I have:

VM FreeBSD 9.1 5.6.10-ent VMWare 5.1:
2919 4758 8661 14075 16436 16328 17172 17636 17926 18218

CentOS 6:
5677 11253 22129 32096 45800 47091 42608 13097 12979 13282

FreeBSD 9.1:
2874 5179 9154 13199 14291 11627 19766 19887 21197 21787
I don't know is these tests could help finding where the problem is, I hope 
so.

I can do other test until wednesday 27/03 if you need.

Thanks,
d.


_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:20:26 +0100
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.dam...@contactlab.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
        Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Message-ID: <5150875a.1000...@contactlab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Il 25/03/13 18:11, Adrian Chadd ha scritto:

Can you please run a Linux install in a FreeBSD jail so we can see
whether it's the kernel or userland?


Sure, do you have a link on how to install gnu/linux on a fbsd jail?

Is ok if I use the VM I created in vmware (so it will be VMWARE ->
FreeBSD -> Linux Jail)?
Hi, thanks for your support and ideas but I have to stop my test sessions because I need to use my pair of servers in production (and very quickly, too), so at this moment they'll remain fbsd 9.1 :) 

Thank you again,
d.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to