Re: Apparent performance regression 8.3@ -> 8.4@r255966?

2013-10-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi David, How about just picking a revision of stable/8 half way between the good and not good version, then re-test? It'd help to narrow down the range of commits that could've caused problems. -adrian ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing lis

Re: Apparent performance regression 8.3@ -> 8.4@r255966?

2013-10-10 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:02:47PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 07/10/2013 19:28, David Wolfskill wrote:> At work, we have a bunch of > machines that developers use to build some > > software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx > > (with a few local patches, which have s

Re: Apparent performance regression 8.3@ -> 8.4@r255966?

2013-10-10 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/10/13 10:02 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: On 07/10/2013 19:28, David Wolfskill wrote:> At work, we have a bunch of machines that developers use to build some software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx (with a few local patches, which have since been committed to stable

Re: Apparent performance regression 8.3@ -> 8.4@r255966?

2013-10-10 Thread Ivan Voras
On 07/10/2013 19:28, David Wolfskill wrote:> At work, we have a bunch of machines that developers use to build some > software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx > (with a few local patches, which have since been committed to stable/8), > and the software is built within