On 3 June 2016 at 11:27, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> That and the other NUMA stuff is something to address in -12.
And, I completely welcome continued development in NUMA scaling in
combination with discussion. The iterator changes I committed are a
more generic version of a patch people were applying
On 3 June 2016 at 10:55, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:29:13AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Konstantin Belousov
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:29:16AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
>> >> I notice that, with the exception of the VM_
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:29:16AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
>> I notice that, with the exception of the VM_PHYSSEG_MAX change, these
>> patches never made it into head or ports. Are they unsuitable for low
>> core-count machines, or i
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:29:13AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:29:16AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> >> I notice that, with the exception of the VM_PHYSSEG_MAX change, these
> >> patches never made it into h
> >>> A couple small steps have been taken toward eliminating the need for
> >>> this
> >>> hack: the addition of the "page size index" field to struct vm_page and
> >>> the
> >>> addition of a similarly named parameter to pmap_enter(). However, at
> >>> the
> >>> moment, the only ta
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:29:16AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote:
> I notice that, with the exception of the VM_PHYSSEG_MAX change, these
> patches never made it into head or ports. Are they unsuitable for low
> core-count machines, or is there some other reason not to commit them?
> If not, what woul
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 10:47, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:00:22 pm Alan Cox wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:09 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:52:45 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>>
