Am Tue, 7 Mar 2017 02:14:44 +0100 Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> schrieb:
> There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of > Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections. > FreeBSD is the worst in this test. > > https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf > > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Thank you so much for this finding. It is interesting that with a generic kernel, the "performance" is roughly the half of what Linux and DFBSD would give. I miss performance benchmarks, it seems, that over the past couple of years this habit has become quite unusual for FreeBSD. Oliver -- O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG).
pgpVde0pdhlsg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
