Maybe someone should retest and see where the problem. It doesn't help in saying the test sucks or is done wrong.
On 9 March 2017 at 20:26, O. Hartmann <ohartm...@walstatt.org> wrote: > Am Tue, 7 Mar 2017 02:14:44 +0100 > Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> schrieb: > > > There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of > > Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections. > > FreeBSD is the worst in this test. > > > > https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html > > > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png > > > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf > > > > Miroslav Lachman > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance- > unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > Thank you so much for this finding. > > It is interesting that with a generic kernel, the "performance" is roughly > the half of > what Linux and DFBSD would give. > > I miss performance benchmarks, it seems, that over the past couple of > years this habit > has become quite unusual for FreeBSD. > > Oliver > > -- > O. Hartmann > > Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für > Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG). > _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"