On 9/24/14 8:09 AM, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:29:22AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 23/09/2014 00:22, David Wolfskill wrote:
... I rather wish I could get the same information via sysctl. (Well,
something seems to be available via the "opaque" kern.devstat.all
sysctl(8
se that difference in the real
> time it takes to run that script???
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim.
>
> _______
> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> To un
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080220 13:42] wrote:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >>>Take a look at the level of packet fragmentation you are encountering;
> >>>yes, this is expected and things will wor
* Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080220 10:35] wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 3:23 AM, Valerio Daelli wrote:
> > 99904 total packets received
> [ ... ]
> >
> > 61441 fragments received
>
> [ ... ]
> > 34819 output datagrams fragmented
> > 208914 fragments created
>
> Ta
* Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071225 16:45] wrote:
> On 12/21/07, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried the 'noatime' mount option? That should help.
>
> Yeah, the zfs set atime=off was already done
>
>
* Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071221 15:53] wrote:
> On 12/21/07, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What application are you scanning these files with? I know I had
> > issues with rsync in particular where I had to have it rsync
&
* Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071221 12:48] wrote:
> On 12/21/07, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alfred !
>
> >
> > There is a lot of very good tuning advice in this thread, however
> > one thing to note is that having
* Alexandre Biancalana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071219 11:35] wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a backup server running FreeBSD 7-BETA3. The cpu is CPU:
> Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz, 3GB Ram, 10x 500GB
> SATA, Areca 1231-ML, the filesystem used to backup my other servers
> locally is
is the lack of row level locking
for MYISAM tables, I found that to be a write performance killer with
multiple concurrent accesses.
INNODB is supposedly better.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
* Sanket Somnath Hase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070924 01:29] wrote:
> Hi Matt ,
>
> We are graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University. We are enrolled in
> a course (Operating systems practicum http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/ ) which
> involves hands-on experience with operating-system code as it is
* Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070916 08:46] wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> >Or more likely they'll continue to maintain a sched_yield that isn't
> >posix compliant. We may just want to add some sort of interface so the
> >jvm can tell the kernel that sched_yield should b
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070910 16:32] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >Palle,
> >
> >I really haven't kept pace with Intel versus AMD in a while, my
> >understanding is that AMD is still the only 64bit game in town.
> >
> >For a
e better off getting AMD processors,
> when running Unix?
>
> Regards,
> Palle
>
> ___
> freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
13 matches
Mail list logo
