On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:51:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:37:52 +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine (Pentium
> > > 4) in very visible
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
> >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem
> >> has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE scheduler.
> >
&
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs
> > > much better than SCHED_4BSD?
> >
> > I complained about poor interactive performance of ULE in a desktop
> > e
