Its probably "dirhash' that is not enabled or its cache is too small for the
task.
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubs
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:22:46PM +0200 Arkadi Shishlov mentioned:
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Most basedir problems are linked with the fact it produce a lot of lstast/
readlinks on every require, include or open command. On Linux it pereforms
even worse, as they
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
I'd suggest you to disable open_basedir at all or roll out specialized
implementation. I had a lot of similar problems with open_basedir in
the past, so I just rewrote it to match our specific security policy.
Can you share a hint how exactly this specialized implementati
Joao Barros wrote:
> On a P4 3.06GHz with HTT enabled and ULE I get the same results.
> I get a flat line at 58% looking at the bandwith in task manager on a
> Windows 2003 Server while doing a cached read.
> I can get up to 70% bandwith during writes.
> Percentages are relative to 100Mbits bandwit
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:28:48AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> >Yer know about the list but was looking for real usage experiences
> >as I've tried supported cards before e.g. netgear and it just panics the
> >machine with just ping :(
>
> I use the em cards (Intel Pro 1
