Re: Scheduler + IPC performance on FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9.0 and -CURRENT

2012-04-06 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: > Il 06 aprile 2012 18:54, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: >>> Il 05 aprile 2012 19:03, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto: >>>> Hi folks,

Re: Scheduler + IPC performance on FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9.0 and -CURRENT

2012-04-06 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Attilio Rao wrote: > Il 05 aprile 2012 19:03, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto: >> Hi folks, >> >> Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the >> `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking &g

Re: Scheduler + IPC performance on FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9.0 and -CURRENT

2012-04-06 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Florian Smeets wrote: > On 05.04.12 20:03, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >> Hi folks, > > Hi, >> >> Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the >> `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linu

Scheduler + IPC performance on FreeBSD 7.4, 8.2, 9.0 and -CURRENT

2012-04-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi folks, Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking down various kind of regression/improvement. `hackbench' is a scheduler + IPC test (socket xor pipe). It creates producers/consumers groups and let a variable q

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2012-01-04 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, wrote: > Thanks. > > My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to > ensure expected behaviour. > Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server install ? If not, you should not have to tune the FreeBSD i