On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:32:41AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> The CPUs between those machines are quite different.
I wouldn't say they are "quite" different. It's not like comparing
Netburst to Core2, or I believe even original Core2 to Sandybridge.
I may be wrong, I've not followed Intel cores
Hi all,
$WORK is looking to see what throwing money at a build can do.
We've been building the product on FreeBSD 8.3/amd64 in a 7.1/i386 jail,
on on Supermicro X8DT3
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/qpi/5500/x8dt3.cfm
w/Xeon X5690 3.47GHz: "2 package(s) x 6 core(s) x 2 SMT threads".
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:42:45PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> TCP mounts should be used whenever possible thesedays (I flipped the
> default mode in 8.0 the other day).
And I made TCP mounts the default for Amd over a year ago. NFS really
has moved on to TCP these days.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:57:32AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> It seems that Broadcom is back into this game.
So far the Broadcom Serverworks HT1000 SATA controller is POO.
I'm seeing all kinds of disk corruption with FreeBSD on a Tyan s3992.
Googling shows that other FreeBSD users have been l
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Jakubik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >>No! Socket AM2 is the DDR2 939-pin Athlon64 desktop replacement.
> >>Socket F(1207) is DDR2 the 940-pin Opteron server replacement.
> >>
> >
> >Same c
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:30:14PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> >
> >>Steven Hartland wrote:
> >>
> >>>IIRC AM2 is not a server solution just a clie
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> >IIRC AM2 is not a server solution just a client one the new server
> >socket is significantly different.
>
> Its not a server/desktop thing, its a new socket that will allow AMD to
> use DDR2 memory. It appl
