On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >another while the box didn't do anything else than copying. I watched the
> >copy process via 'systat -vmstat 1' and realized, that the value of 'KB/t'
> >never go byond 128 (128kb buffer limit?). But more frustrating, I never go
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:22:16AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:36:05AM +0100 I heard the voice of
> Divacky Roman, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > hm.. now I am confused. the rule is that having I586_CPU improves
> > performance because
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:18:03PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 04:03 PM 11/24/2006, Divacky Roman wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >> At 03:28 AM 11/24/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 2006-11-23 at
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 03:28 AM 11/24/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> >On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:52 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
> >> I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference.
> >
> >That would be very interesting.
>
> OpenBSD 4.0 i386 panics on boo
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:59:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
> with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the
> first results. The first tests are for serving up static data.
>
> System:
> Superm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:52:51PM -0400, Jerry Bell wrote:
> I have a Dell PE2950 with 2 dual core 3.73Ghz processors and 4G of ram.
> I've looked through some of the lists here and have seen super-smack
> results in the 42k qps range on a 2 dual core opteron system. I'm able to
> get up to abou
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:42:41PM -0400, Nick Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:30:23 -0400
> Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nick Evans wrote:
> > > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Quite possibly, just as MySQL has been written with Linux primarily in
>
cannot this be related to low value of nswbufs (fixed in curennt and I think
releng_6)?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 06:33:57PM +0200, JG wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had to unpack a lot of tar archives and I occasional noticed terrible
> bad performance on freebsd5.
>
> This is my test file:
>
> 85425152
