Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/28/2012 14:40, Florian Smeets wrote: > The results are available in this Google docs spreadsheet, if you > scroll down there are also some nice graphs. > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai0N1xDe3uNAdDRxcVFiYjNMSnJWOTZhUWVWWlBlem

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-14 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/13/2011 13:31, Malin Randstrom wrote: > stop sending me spam mail ... you never stop despite me having unsubscribeb > several times. stop this! If you had actually unsubscribed, the mail would have stopped. :) You can see the instructions you need to follow below. > ___

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote: > Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs > much better than SCHED_4BSD? I complained about poor interactive performance of ULE in a desktop environment for years. I had numerous people try to help, including Jeff, with various t