Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Eivind Hestnes
98225 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360-647-0785 On Apr 19, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Eivind Hestnes wrote: Thanks for the advice. Didn't do any difference, though.. Perhaps I should try to increase the polling frequency.. Jerald Von Dipple wrote: Hey man You need to bump kern.polling.burst: 150 Upto at least 1

Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Eivind Hestnes
ry to increase the polling frequency too see if this increases the bandwidth with polling enabled.. Thanks for the advice btw.. - E. Jon Noack wrote: On 4/19/2005 1:32 PM, Eivind Hestnes wrote: I have an Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT) NIC (em(4) driver 1.7.35) installed in a Pentium III 500 Mhz

Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Eivind Hestnes
Thanks for the advice. Didn't do any difference, though.. Perhaps I should try to increase the polling frequency.. - E. Jerald Von Dipple wrote: Hey man You need to bump kern.polling.burst: 150 Upto at least 15 Regards, Jerald Von D. On 4/19/05, Eivind Hestnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Eivind Hestnes
ed: 0 kern.polling.idlepoll_sleeping: 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/sysctl.conf net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1 net.inet.carp.preempt=1 kern.polling.enable=1 HZ set to 1000 as recommended in README for the em(4) driver. Driver is of cource compiled into kernel. Regards, Eivind He