Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-20 Thread Gary Jennejohn
CPU running FreeeBSD 10.0 and SCHED_4BSD. I've noticed with large ports builds which are not MAKE_JOBS_SAFE that the compile load migrates between the cores pretty quickly, but I haven't compared it to ULE. -- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-per

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-12 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:04:37 -0800 m...@freebsd.org wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Gary Jennejohn > wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:13:00 + > > Vincent Hoffman wrote: > > > >> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Ha

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-12 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:10:46 +0100 Lars Engels wrote: > Did you use -jX to build the world? > I'm top posting since Lars did. It was buildkernel, not buildworld. Yes, -j6. > _____ > Von: Gary Jennejohn > Versendet am: Mon Dec

Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default

2011-12-12 Thread Gary Jennejohn
d this heavily. Usually 2 or more cores were at or below 90%. Not really that significant, but still a noticeable difference in apparent scheduling behavior. Whether the observed difference is due to some change in data from the kernel to gkrellm is beyond me. -- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"